Possible Loss of Civil Liberties……

Are you prepared to lose aspects of our civil liberties in the name of solving the horrible crime problem we are having now? with the raging debate of how to solve the high level of murders, almost everyday, is it sad.
For us as gay people I just have a fear that police excesses will increase once again if proper reporting and monitoring procedures aren’t put in place and as for us as gay people with us under the microscope these days I fear we may come under open homophobia from them.
With all improvements we have seen and yes there have been some improvements in police, public relations, especially the LGBT community I fear we may just regress to the “old days” of excesses towards us.
For example police entering private property where a party is held in the name of a search without a warrant and heckling and jeering.
Think on these things friends………….what do you think
by Howie

Gay artists faces deportation after asylum claim is rejected

An openly gay artist could face torture after his claim for asylum has was dismissed by the Home Office.
Babakhan Badalov (Babi) from Azerbaijan arrived in the UK in 2006 after being repressed and persecuted in his home country.
Azerbaijan legalised homosexuality in 2000.
However, the Muslim country is still a very conservative society and homosexuality remains an extremely taboo subject.

Full Story

the asylum route these days is becoming more tedious than before it seems, many Jamaicans for example in the UK are having some hurdles in proving their status as abused homosexuals for example one person was rejected asylum on the grounds that he was not “campy” enough, he was said to be “too masculine” to be gay. Anyway for those who have been successful congrats, for those who are intending to apply just follow the guidelines set, there are no guarantees.
Admin

Scientists study gay brothers in search for cause of homosexuality

Scientists investigating a genetic basis for homosexuality will be recruiting more pairs of gay brothers in Chicago this weekend.
The Molecular Genetic Study of Sexual Orientation is the most extensive study of its kind.
It was embarked upon by a team of researchers from Chicago universities four years ago.
Researchers hope that by gathering DNA samples from 1,000 sets of gay brothers they will be able to find genetic linkages smaller studies failed to detect.
The results of the study could lead to massive controversy, both by providing ammunition in the raging cultural war over homosexuality and by raising fears about ethically questionable applications like genetic profiling and prenatal testing.
However, the scientists involved argue that the research is essential to our biological understanding of sexual behaviour.
“If there are genetic contributions to sexual orientation, they will not remain hidden forever. The march of genetic science can’t be stopped,” Timothy F. Murphy, the bio ethicist adviser to the study, told the Chicago Tribune.
“It’s not a question of whether we should or should not do this research, it’s that we make sure we’re prepared to protect people from insidious uses of this science.”
Scientists are largely in agreement that sexual orientation is at least partially determined by biology.
Gregg Mierow, a participant in the study, has two gay brothers and three straight brothers.
“It seems innate to me,” Mierow, who works in advertising and as a yoga teacher in Chicago, told the Chicago Tribune.
“It doesn’t seem like there’s any choice involved, and it seemed very clear even when we were very young.”
Twins studies have consistently suggested that there are both genetic and environmental components to homosexuality.
Identical twins, who share 100% of their genes, show a higher chance of both being gay, compared to non-identical twins who only share half their genetic code but the same environment.
Researchers in the early nineties began comparing the genetic codes of gay brothers, who also share 50% of their genes in linkage studies.
A ‘linkage study’ tries to detect areas that show up in both men at a frequency higher than chance, suggesting one or more genes in that region might be linked to sexual orientation.
In 1993, geneticist Dean Hamer announced his group had found such a region on the X chromosome, which males inherit from their mothers.
But the number of brother pairs used in the study was small and subsequent studies failed to replicate Hamer’s findings.
“In complex gene scenarios, people figured out that you need a larger sample size in order to get reasonable statistical power,” Dr. Alan Sanders, a psychiatrist at Evanston Northwestern Healthcare and the leader of the current study told the Chicago Tribune.
To increase the chances of finding genetic areas associated with homosexuality, Sanders proposed collecting almost 10 times the sibling pairs of previous studies.
The project received funding in 2001 and began recruiting subjects at gay pride festivals, through gay-oriented publications and on the Internet.
So far the Chicago researchers have obtained blood or saliva DNA samples and survey data from more than 600 brother sets, with several hundred other volunteers in the process of submitting one or the other.
Sanders hopes to publish his findings from the first wave of DNA samples in a scientific journal sometime next year.
But he warns that linkage study can single out only regions of the genetic code, not individual genes.
“One of the advantages of linkage studies is that we don’t have to know those things ahead of time,” Sanders said.
“It’s a big advantage here because we don’t know about the biology of sexual orientation yet, so we can find the genes first and then study the biology.”
“The genes would probably be doing their work by affecting sexual differentiation of the brain during prenatal life,” J. Michael Bailey, a Northwestern University psychology professor involved with the project told the Chicago Tribune.
“But what scientists are increasingly appreciating is that genes can affect a trait in ways you could never have guessed.”
The project will be searching for gay men with gay brothers at this weekend’s Halstead Street festival.

Homosexuals found to have ‘different brain structure’ in new study

Scientists have recently found that the brains of homosexuals have structural and functional differences from those of their straight counterparts.
The Wellcome Trust Centre for neuro-imaging at University College London used magnetic resonance imaging, or MRI to look into the brains of 80 men and women, including 16 gays and 15 lesbians.
They found that lesbians have a “male-like” proportion and distribution of grey matter in their brain when compared with heterosexual women.
“In homosexual women, the perirhinal cortex grey matter displayed a male-like structural pattern,” the researchers said in a paper published in the Public Library of Science. The perirhinal area is associated with social and sexual behaviour.
Another study done in Sweden claims that chemical pheromones, which affect our sense of smell, are different for gay men and straight men.
Writing in the Proceedings of the National Academy for Science, Ivanka Savic of the Karolinska Institutet presented 12 gay men, 12 heterosexual woman and 12 heterosexual men with male sweat.
She found that both heterosexual women and gay men responded strongly when smelling male sweat which contained a chemical found in the male hormone testosterone while heterosexual men have little response.
These work reports similar findings to the widely published work of Simon LeVay in 1991.
LeVay worked on brains of both homosexual and heterosexual people who died of AIDS and found that the anterior hypothalamus, an area linked to sexual behaviour, is twice as big in heterosexual men compared to women and homosexual men.
These studies imply that the brains of the gay men have functional similarities to those of a straight women, and that homosexuality is not of a moral choice, but one of biological substrate.
However, there are some concerns in regards to the accurately of these tests. Firstly, all of the research involved a small sample size of specific place and so does not represent the wider community. Also, other studies have shown a person’s lifestyle can lead to structural brain changes.
“There are many ongoing studies in the field, and I think that we soon will have a better clarification,” Savic said to the National Geographic. “At the moment, there is no definite proofs.”